What must be explained during a consultation when representing multiple clients in a single matter?

When representing multiple clients in a single matter, it is crucial to explain both the disadvantages and the risks involved. This is essential for informed consent, ensuring that each client understands the potential implications of joint representation, including conflicts of interest that may arise and how they might affect the case.

In such scenarios, all clients must fully grasp how their interests may diverge and how that could influence the legal strategy, outcomes, and confidentiality. Failing to communicate these aspects could lead to ethical issues and potential malpractice claims, as the clients could argue that they were not fully informed before consenting to the representation arrangement.

Addressing only the disadvantages or only the risks would not provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation, leaving clients potentially vulnerable to unforeseen complications. Authorization from the court after a hearing is generally not a substitute for this thorough explanation during the consultation process.